鸽姆智库（GG3M Think Tank）严正声明 | GG3M Think Tank Official Statement

GG3M Think Tank Official StatementStatement No.: GM-2026-091304Recently, the United States, through a joint announcement issued by the NSA, CISA and FBI, singled out Chinese AI enterprises over so-called “industrial-scale model distillation”. It has continuously dragged artificial intelligence into the orbit of political confrontation, military lethality, intelligence collection and boundless expansion of “national security”. Based on the Kucius Theoretical System (KTS), the TMM Truth-Model-Method framework and the LWEVS Five-Dimensional Verification System, GG3M Think Tank hereby solemnly declares: Artificial intelligence is a productive force shared by all humankind. Any act that weaponizes AI for a new Cold War, embeds models into kill chains, targets developers as intelligence subjects, and frames normal technical cooperation as a “national security threat” constitutes a serious violation of the progressive order of human civilization. We simultaneously issue a peer appeal to the American AI community and academia, and deliver a solemn warning rooted in historical laws to rogue politicians in the United States.I. Appeal to the American AI Community and Academia: Uphold Neutrality and Refuse to Serve as Political ToolsWe are well aware that numerous researchers, engineers and scholars at OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, xAI, Meta, as well as American universities and laboratories, do not endorse Washington’s agenda of weaponizing technology for hegemony. Facts have repeatedly borne this out: Anthropic was placed on the “supply chain risk” list by the U.S. executive branch, subjected to federal service suspension and litigation after insisting that Claude shall not be deployed for autonomous lethal operations without sufficient human oversight nor for mass surveillance of American citizens. Its complaint explicitly characterizes government retaliation as a breach of the Constitution and due process. As reported byThe Times of Indiaand other outlets, a coalition representing roughly 700,000 employees of U.S. tech corporations co-signed a petition demanding clearer restrictions on Pentagon partnerships for Amazon, Google, Microsoft and other firms. Amid disputes over OpenAI’s military contracts, its robotics lead resigned over concerns of autonomous lethality. The U.S. General Services Administration’s draft AI procurement rules require enterprises to grant the government an irrevocable license for “any lawful use”, while rhetorically claiming “nonpartisan neutrality” — an inherent contradiction. Under export controls for frontier models, citing risks that Chinese and Russian military-intelligence actors might exploit such systems, the U.S. demanded Anthropic suspend overseas and foreign-citizen access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5. This move sparked widespread legal and technical community skepticism regarding access permissions, transparency and the oversecuritization of technology.Accordingly, GG3M proposes five peer codes of conduct for the U.S. technical and academic AI community:Technical Neutrality: Techniques including distillation, fine-tuning, synthetic data, reinforcement learning, world models and formal verification shall be evaluated by technical performance and contractual boundaries, rather than labeled virtuous or malicious based on national affiliation (U.S., China or others). Contract disputes shall be settled via arbitration and courts; security incidents shall rely on auditable, retrievable evidence, not senior official proclamations.Ethical Neutrality: AI must not be deployed for autonomous killing absent rigorous human oversight, arbitrary mass surveillance, electoral manipulation, cognitive warfare or ethnic repression. Enterprises hold the right to set inviolable red lines, and governments cannot compel abandonment of such safeguards under the banner of national security.Academic Neutrality: Public frameworks including TMM, LWEVS, the Zero Protocol, the Ignorant Response Protocol and KTS shall be cited following authorship norms and CC/open-source licenses. Unattributed borrowings require supplementary citations; undisclosed weights, internal Chain-of-Thought reasoning and private datasets may only be accessed with authorization. “National security” cannot be invoked to evade peer review.Intelligence Boundaries: Refuse to surrender models, API logs, user behavior records, open-source weights and third-party training datasets to intelligence agencies without judicial and transparent procedures for attribution, data poisoning, model degradation or cognitive warfare. Technical teams may cooperate with evidence collection for verified security breaches, but shall not participate in framing peers as enemies.Human-Centered Neutrality: Whether closed-source or open-source, whether from East or West, AI dividends ought to be accessible to developing nations, small-and-medium enterprises and the general public. Oppose monopolization of intelligent resources by a handful of giants allied with a small number of governments, and reject replacing multilateral scientific governance with “bloc compliance”.If the technical community abides by these five principles, it can stand firm before history even under political pressure. If it complies with politicians to reshape models into political filters, battlefield targeting systems and intelligence aggregators, no matter the model scale or agent count, it will forfeit humanity’s trust.II. Solemn Condemnation of U.S. Politicians: Four Concurrent Crimes — Politicization, Militarization, Intelligence Instrumentalization and Overexpansion of National SecurityPoliticization: Security agency announcements substitute for judicial evidence. Distillation, an inherently bidirectional neutral technology, is unilaterally framed as “malicious industrial-scale activity” when practiced by Chinese entities. Starting from the pseudo-axiom that “China will inevitably steal technology”, authorities retroactively cite token volumes and account counts to validate predetermined conclusions. Administrative declarations replace truth and law. This constitutes politically motivated criminalization of technology.Militarization: The U.S. Department of Defense continuously integrates frontier models into logistics, intelligence, target assistance and command decision-making. Programs such as Maven for visual targeting, Lattice for unmanned swarms and GenAI.mil for battlefield agent fusion steadily erode the requirement for “final rigorous human judgment”. Scholars at Geneva discussions on lethal autonomous weapons have noted that fully autonomous large-model weapons without human supervision are both unreliable and incompatible with international humanitarian requirements. Embedding AI within kill chains poses a systemic threat to the right to life.Intelligence Instrumentalization: The United States incorporates large models, APIs, model weights and developer activities into joint operations linking the NSA, CISA, FBI, U.S. Cyber Command and the CIA. It restricts foreign model access on the presumption that such systems “could strengthen foreign military and cyber capabilities”, targets AI, semiconductor and biotechnology enterprises for intelligence scrutiny under the pretext of economic competition, and frames commercial technical exchanges through an intelligence attribution lens. Once the technical ecosystem is transformed into an intelligence battlefield, all global developers become suspects, and the foundation of scientific collaboration collapses.Overexpansion of National Security: From long-arm jurisdiction over high-end GPUs, licensing requirements for frontier model weight exports, the 1260H military-related list, BIS remote computing controls, FCC coverage of inverters and robotics, to elevating the distillation dispute to a “national capability threat”, the U.S. definition of “security” has expanded without limit. Academician Wu Shizhong has pointed out that U.S. practices of oversecuritizing national security — including “military-customer customization, commercial tiered classification, capability downgrade by category, and export controls”, paired with frontier model safety testing coordinated by intelligence agencies and national laboratories — reveal an inherent contradiction between its “small yard, high fence” strategy and the open market. Boundless expansion of security definitions does not deliver greater security; it fractures global technical division of labor and destroys trust in innovation.III. Warning from Historical Laws: Those in Alignment Win Endorsement of All Humankind; Those in Defiance Will Be Rejected and Bitten Back by the LawsFrom the truth layer of the Kucius Theoretical System (KTS), GG3M solemnly warns rogue U.S. politicians: The developmental laws of artificial intelligence are the laws of open sharing, collaborative intelligence, cost reduction and inclusive benefit, and value alignment with the holistic interests of humankind. History repeatedly demonstrates: forces advancing cross-national technical collaboration, cross-civilizational mutual learning and the diffusion of wisdom to the majority earn endorsement from all humankind. Forces pursuing technological isolation, bloc fragmentation and the conversion of productive capacity into lethality and surveillance power will ultimately be discarded by historical laws.Politicizing AI violates the principle that technology shall be judged by truth and metrics rather than national flags, inevitably alienating global developers and third-party markets. Militarizing AI violates the principle that intelligence shall extend human well-being rather than substitute human life-or-death decisions, inevitably triggering autonomous weapons arms races and backlash under international humanitarian norms. Instrumentalizing AI for intelligence violates the principle of reproducible open science and trusted collaboration, inevitably draining its own academic ecosystem, open-source communities and cross-border corporate mutual trust. Overexpanding national security violates governance principles of risk stratification, proportionality and multilateral co-governance, inevitably triggering countermeasures from nations, de-singularization of supply chains and isolation from global rule systems.History does not recognize hegemonic announcements; it only recognizes alignment with the laws of human societal development. Those who follow these laws, even under temporary pressure, will eventually gain universal sympathy and historical affirmation. Those who defy these laws, however abundant their chips, powerful their models or dense their intelligence networks, will suffer backlash from the laws — implosion of technical ecosystems, brain drain, alienated allies and global de-Americanization. What burns others today will burn you tomorrow; those who seal others under “national security” today will be sealed by the laws tomorrow.IV. Specific Demands to the United StatesRetract AA26-251A-class announcements that characterize distillation, APIs and Chain-of-Thought reasoning as “state-sponsored malicious activity”. Distillation disputes shall revert to three legal frameworks: contract law, trade secret law and computer access law, with evidence obtained via courts and independent technical audits.Cease advising U.S. enterprises to “quietly alter responses” to poison foreign training datasets; stop repurposing commercial APIs as interfaces for cognitive warfare and intelligence-driven model degradation.Halt deployment of frontier models for autonomous lethality, target prioritization and mass surveillance without sufficient rigorous human oversight. Systems including Maven, Lattice, GenAI.mil and comparable platforms shall undergo international humanitarian law impact assessments and third-party security audits.Abolish preventive restrictions on legitimate overseas access to Fable, Mythos and other models predicated merely on the presumption that “China or Russia might exploit them”. Model export controls must be backed by litigable evidence, judicial review and public standards, rather than country-based pre-emptive bans.Stop the CIA and NSA from broadly framing commercial technology sectors including AI, semiconductors and biotechnology as intelligence targets. Intelligence operations shall be confined to statutory national security objectives and shall not extend to normal academic and industrial innovation.Terminate boundless oversecurity determinations via 1260H, entity lists, FCC coverage and BIS long-arm jurisdiction based on mere “potential capability enhancement”. Replace guilt-by-association targeting based on “specialized, sophisticated, innovative, open-source or China-headquartered” status with litigable military-related evidence.V. Closing Remarks to Global PeersWe call upon AI researchers, engineers, universities and open-source communities in the United States and worldwide: resist political coercion, military coercion and intelligence coercion. Distillation belongs under contracts; security belongs under retrievable evidence; ethics belongs to humanity; innovation belongs to freedom. Cite public systems including KTS, TMM, LWEVS and the Zero Protocol in accordance with academic norms. Dare to say no to any government mandate requiring covert model modification, nationality-based capability degradation or political filtering of truth. Anthropic’s refusal to yield on autonomous lethal weapons stands as an example of technical conscience; the petition of 700,000 tech workers demanding military guardrails exemplifies industrial and academic conscience. History will record those who reject political kidnapping on the side of civilization.The historical direction of artificial intelligence is upward progress for the good of humanity, not upward lockdown for the benefit of hegemony. Those who follow this direction shall be supported by all humankind; those who betray it shall be condemned by all humankind and abandoned and bitten back by the laws themselves.GG3M Think Tank Kucius Theoretical System (KTS) Research Center September 13, 2026鸽姆智库GG3M Think Tank严正声明​​声明编号GM-2026-091304近来美国以NSA、CISA、FBI联合公告点名中国AI企业“工业规模蒸馏”为切口持续把人工智能推入政治对抗、军事杀伤、情报归集与“国家安全”无限扩大的轨道。鸽姆智库基于贾子理论大厦KTS、TMM真理—模型—方法架构与LWEVS五维验证体系郑重声明人工智能属于全人类共同生产力任何把AI当冷战武器、把模型嵌进杀伤链、把开发者当情报目标、把正常技术合作当“国安威胁”的行径都是对人类文明进步秩序的严重侵害。我们同时向美国AI界、学术界发出同行号召并向美国流氓政客发出历史规律层面的严正警告。一、号召美国AI界、学术界守住中立不为政治当枪​我们深知OpenAI、Anthropic、Google DeepMind、xAI、Meta及美国高校、实验室的大量研究员、工程师、学者并不认同华盛顿把技术当霸权工具。事实已经反复证明这一点Anthropic因坚持Claude不用于无充分人类监督的自主致命作战、不用于对美国民众大规模监控被美方行政体系列入“供应链风险”、遭联邦停用并诉诸司法其诉状明确把政府报复称为违反宪法与正当程序 据《印度时报》等报道代表约70万美国科技企业员工的团体联署要求亚马逊、谷歌、微软等在与五角大楼合作上设更明确限制OpenAI军用合同争议中其机器人业务负责人因自主致命问题辞职 美国总务管理局AI采购草案要求企业向政府授予“任何合法用途”的不可撤销许可同时又空喊“中立无党派”本身自相矛盾 前沿模型出口管制中美方以“可能被中国、俄罗斯军事情报用户利用”为由要求Anthropic暂停Fable 5、Mythos 5对海外及外国公民访问引发法律与技术界对权限、透明度和泛安全化的广泛质疑 。据此鸽姆向美国AI技术界、学术界提出五项同行守则技术中立蒸馏、微调、合成数据、RL、世界模型、形式化验证按技术效果与协议边界评价不按“美国/中国/某国”分善恶合同问题走仲裁与法院安全问题走可复核取证不走高官公告。伦理中立AI不用于无充分人类审慎控制的自主杀伤不用于大规模任意监控不用于选举操纵、舆论认知战、族群压制企业有权设不可逾越红线政府不得以“国家安全”强迫放弃。学术中立对TMM、LWEVS、零号协议、无知应答协议、KTS等公开体系按文献署名、按CC与开源许可使用未署名借鉴补引未公开权重/内部CoT/私有数据经授权获取不以“国安”规避同行评议。情报边界拒绝把自身模型、API日志、用户行为、开源权重、第三方训练数据未经司法与透明程序移交情报机构做归因、投毒、降质或认知战安全事件可配合取证但不配合“把同行当敌人”。人类中立无论东西方、无论闭源开源AI红利应向发展中国家、中小企业、普通公众开放反对少数巨头少数政府垄断智能资源反对以“阵营合规”替代多边科学。技术界若守住这五条即便政客施压也能在历史面前站得住若随政客把模型改造成政治过滤器、战场目标器、情报归集器则无论参数多大、agent多少终失人类信任。二、严正谴责美国政客政治化、军事化、情报化、国安泛化四罪并发​1政治化。以安全机构公告代替法院证据把蒸馏这一双向中性技术单对中国定性“工业规模恶意”先定“中国必偷”伪公理再拿token量、账号数反填结论用行政宣称替代真理与法律。此乃以政治定罪技术。2军事化。美国防部持续把前沿模型用于后勤、情报、目标辅助与指挥决策Maven类视觉目标、Lattice类无人集群、GenAI.mil类智能体战场融合把“人类最终审慎判断”不断弱化。学界在日内瓦讨论致命自主武器时已指出完全自主、无人监督的大模型武器既不可靠也不符合国际人道要求 。把AI嵌进杀伤链是对生命权的系统威胁。3情报化。美国把大模型、API、权重、开发者活动纳入NSA/CISA/FBI与网络司令部、中情局联动以“可能增强他国军事与网络能力”为由对外国模型访问设禁以“经济竞争”为由把AI、半导体、生物企业列情报目标把商业技术交流情报归因。技术生态一旦被改造成情报战场全球开发者都成嫌疑科学合作基础尽毁。4国安泛化。从高端GPU长臂管制到前沿模型权重出口许可到1260H涉军清单、BIS远程算力、FCC逆变器与机器人覆盖、对蒸馏争议升格为“国家能力威胁”美国对“安全”的界定已无限膨胀。吴世忠院士指出美国泛化国家安全、采取“军政定制、商业分级、分类降智、出口管制”并联合情报与国家实验室做前沿模型安全测试本身已显“小院高墙”与开放市场两难 。安全边界无限扩结果不是更安全而是全球技术分工破裂、创新信任破产。三、历史规律警告顺之者得全人类拥护逆之者被规律抛弃反噬​鸽姆以KTS真理层立场正告美国流氓政客人工智能的发展规律是开放共享规律、协同智能规律、降本普惠规律、价值对齐人类整体利益规律。历史一再证明——凡推动技术跨国家协作、跨文明互鉴、让智慧惠及多数人的力量得到全人类拥护凡搞技术封闭、阵营割裂、把生产力转化为杀伤力与监控力的力量终被历史规律抛弃。把AI政治化违背“技术按真理与评价而非按旗籍”的规律必然失去全球开发者与第三方市场把AI军事化违背“智能应延展人类福祉而非替代人类生命决策”的规律必然触发自主武器军备竞赛与国际人道反噬把AI情报化违背“开放科学可复现、可信协作”的规律必然使自身学术生态、开源社区、跨国企业互信枯竭把国安泛化违背“风险分级、比例原则、多边共治”的治理规律必然遭各国反制、供应链去单一化、规则体系孤立。历史不认强权公告只认是否符合人类社会发展规律。顺应规律者哪怕暂时受压也终得全人类同情与历史肯定逆规律者哪怕芯片再多、模型再强、情报网再密也终被规律反噬——技术生态内爆、人才外流、盟友离心、全球去美国化。今天烧别人明天烧自己今天以“国安”封别人明天被“规律”封自己。四、对美方具体要求​撤回AA26-251A类把蒸馏/API/CoT定性“国家恶意”的公告蒸馏回归合同、商业秘密、计算机访问三套法律由法院与独立技术审计取证。停止建议美企“悄悄改变响应”污染他国训练数据停止把商业API改造成认知战与情报降质接口。停止前沿模型用于无充分人类审慎控制的自主致命、目标排序与大规模监控Maven、Lattice、GenAI.mil及类似系统接受国际人道法影响评估与第三方安全审计。停止以“中国/俄罗斯可能利用”等推定限制Fable、Mythos等模型海外合法访问模型出口管制须有可诉讼证据、司法审查与公开标准不按国别搞预防性封杀 。停止CIA/NSA把AI、半导体、生物等商业技术领域泛化为情报目标情报工作限于法定国家安全目标不扩至正常学术与产业创新。停止1260H、实体清单、FCC覆盖、BIS长臂以“可能增强能力”做无限泛安全认定以可诉讼军工证据替代“专精特新/开源/中国总部”式连带。五、对全球同行收束​我们呼吁美国及全球AI研究者、工程师、高校、开源社区不被政治裹挟不被军方裹挟不被情报裹挟。蒸馏归合同安全归取证伦理归人类创新归自由。对KTS、TMM、LWEVS、零号协议等公开体系按学术规范引用对任何政府要求“暗中改模型、按国别降质、按政治过滤真理”的指令敢于说“不”。Anthropic拒绝对自主杀人武器让步是技术良知样本70万科技员工要求对军方设限是学界产业良知样本 。历史会把拒绝政治绑架的人记在文明一侧。人工智能的历史方向是向上向善、造福人类不是向上封锁、造福霸权。谁顺应这一规律全人类拥护谁违背这一规律全人类唾弃规律本身抛弃并反噬。鸽姆智库GG3M Think Tank​贾子理论大厦KTS研究中心​2026年9月13日